The Official Cedar Point Thread
#76
Guest: Grand Admiral_*
Posted 07 September 2006 - 11:50 PM
#77
Posted 24 September 2006 - 10:37 AM
Planned trips for 2008:
Hershey Park
Favorite Park: Busch Gardens Europe
Favorite Coaster: Millennium Force
Coaster Count: 66
Park Count: 14
KD 4, BGE 5, Carowinds 2, USF 1, MBP 2, HP 1, IOA 1, CP 3, Dollywood 1 Family Kingdom 1 SFFT 1 Kemah Boardwalk 1 SFA 1

Yes I am a BGE fanboy.
#79
Posted 24 September 2006 - 05:32 PM
Planned trips for 2008:
Hershey Park
Favorite Park: Busch Gardens Europe
Favorite Coaster: Millennium Force
Coaster Count: 66
Park Count: 14
KD 4, BGE 5, Carowinds 2, USF 1, MBP 2, HP 1, IOA 1, CP 3, Dollywood 1 Family Kingdom 1 SFFT 1 Kemah Boardwalk 1 SFA 1

Yes I am a BGE fanboy.
#80
Guest: Grand Admiral_*
Posted 25 September 2006 - 12:05 AM
#81
Posted 25 September 2006 - 01:00 PM
#82
Posted 25 September 2006 - 04:23 PM
Why not look into the proscpect of building a dive machine similar to the size of Griffon. Cedar Point is about having extreme coasters they should have one that stops overlooking a terrifying vertical drop into complete daarkness of an obyss. The drop should be about 120 ft. though.
I'm not sure about that idea.
When it comes to coasters, Cedar Point defitenly needs more inversions. If they have 17 of them and only 4 of them go upside down, that is a problem.

~Sig by HAJiME~
#83
Posted 25 September 2006 - 07:12 PM
But I still see more flats before another coaster.
#84
Posted 26 September 2006 - 10:32 PM
When it comes to coasters, Cedar Point defitenly needs more inversions. If they have 17 of them and only 4 of them go upside down, that is a problem.
I'm so tired of hearing this from SO many people. (not trying to single B&Mcrazy out!)
Seriously, if I ever go to Cedar Point, I highly dought I will be driving home saying, "Wow, I only went upside down 16 times, they need a floorless!"
#85
Guest: Grand Admiral_*
Posted 07 October 2006 - 12:20 AM
When it comes to coasters, Cedar Point defitenly needs more inversions
Definently not. Inversions are important to making a good coaster, but speed and the drops make it the more better. Besides most of the coasters at Cedar Point don't even have inversions in their layout.
#86
Posted 07 October 2006 - 11:16 AM
I think they need a small break although they haven't gotten a coaster since 2003. Maybe they can even find a way for Soak City to be a part of admission like other parks.
If they add a water ride, it should be like Riptide @ KBF/VF or a log flume with some type of record.
#87
Posted 07 October 2006 - 11:26 AM
Thats your opinion. No one, EVER, can say what will make a coaster better and speak for everyone. Some prefer inversions, some prefer height/speed, some prefer this, some prefer that. So, don't tell me your opinion, and then expect me to change mine because of your's.Definently not. Inversions are important to making a good coaster, but speed and the drops make it the more better.When it comes to coasters, Cedar Point defitenly needs more inversions
Isn't it extremely obvious that's the entire reasoning behind, "CP needs more inversion coasters"? So, I'm confused why you brought that up.Besides most of the coasters at Cedar Point don't even have inversions in their layout.

~Sig by HAJiME~
#88
Posted 09 October 2006 - 06:37 PM
#89
Guest: Grand Admiral_*
Posted 10 October 2006 - 11:07 PM
#91
Guest: Grand Admiral_*
Posted 12 October 2006 - 07:22 PM
#93
Posted 13 October 2006 - 11:58 AM
Note: If you despise new Nicktoon characters, don't go to Carowinds (unless you are like me and it's the only park close by...then you don't have much choice lol), almost half the park is Nick themed. Actually, just close your eyes, ride the Phantom Flyers (ignore that it is Nick themed) and then go enjoy the rest of the park.
#94
Posted 23 October 2006 - 05:51 PM
I think they want to be the trend setters of the amusement industry!
If they wanted to break records, they would have done it for Maverick.
But they didn't and probably won't.
#95
Posted 23 October 2006 - 10:37 PM
#96
Posted 24 October 2006 - 03:58 PM
I hate when parks advertise useless records like the ones you mentioned. They are not even records, in my opinion. How in the world does a new combination of inversions, get so much praise? It's not hard to put some type of inversion after another. Just because it's never been done before dosen't mean it's original. I mean ORIGINAL - imaginative, creative, like X at SFMM original. These "combinations" were going to be put together sooner or later. And then they go and say that two corkscrews and a turn in between is a new kind of inversion.I see them breaking smaller, newer records (if that's what you will want to call them) such as new inversion styles, new combinations, etc., new types/sizes of types.

~Sig by HAJiME~
#97
Posted 24 October 2006 - 07:23 PM
I also think that major record breaking is over. They dont have room for another MF or Magnum, unless they get rid of something, which I dont see coming.

Sig by me, if you would like one of a similar fashion pm me.
#99
Posted 25 October 2006 - 03:27 PM

Avatar from RCT3 Coaster Count - 115 Sig by Strata Force
#100
Guest: Grand Admiral_*
Posted 26 October 2006 - 12:15 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users




This topic is locked










